What Good is Our Love If We Always Communicate It Wrong?

September 10th, 2013

For some odd reason, my blog post on “Calling BS on Rick Warren’s Quote” is getting more comments and traffic than any other post so far. I haven’t even published half the comments because they are all just links to the original quote in context. Thank you to everyone – I now know the context of the original quote. But that was not the whole point of that quote in the first place. I was dealing with how people are misusing the quote, not with Rick Warren himself.

A lot of the comments just had to be deleted as people tried to prove to me that they really don’t hate anyone by… using hateful language directed at me. Interesting, huh?

Most of all, I think a lot of people are so tied up in proving how much they love gays that they missed the point I was making. First of all, maybe you should wonder why you feel the need to prove you are a great gay-loving person to some random stranger on the Internets that runs a very unnoticed blog? Guilty conscious maybe? Me thinketh some of you doth protest too much. But ultimately, you missed my point if you think that whole post was about whether or not people who say they love really do or not. I didn’t contrast the whole situation as either/or. I called BS on saying that your attitude is being “just disagreeing.” It’s not just that – it is usually more. It may be love at some level, but the hurtful, hateful feelings are there, too.

If not, then where is the hurtful, hateful language coming from? So you say you love gays but use disrespectful stereotyping language for them (like the term “lifestyle”)? Can you see where that just doesn’t add up to many people?

Until we get this as the church, we will continue to be written off as irrelevant by people who don’t see the logic there. Disrespect may not equal hate, but to most people it doesn’t equal love, either. What good is our love if we always communicate it wrong? Or is it really love in the first place if it causes more hurt than we intend?

“But sometimes we have to speak the truth in love” people say.

This is usually translated to “I can say whatever mean things I want as long as I think it is truth and I end the rant with ‘but I love you man’ or something pithy like that.” Usually people use that statement as a way to cancel out the “in love” part with the “speak the truth” part.  ”In love” is used as a modifier in the statement, meaning that you take the truth you want to speak and choose words that modify it to come across as loving. It’s not a “get out of jail free” card, designed so that you can say whatever on earth you want and then tack on “in love” at the end. Of course, that is what many in the church do in my experience… and they whine about it when they get busted for it on Facebook or some random stranger’s blog.

[you can read more posts like this on my blog: Ecclesia Extraneus: Confessions of a Metamodern Christian (ecclesiaextraneus.wordpress.com)]

Matt’s 2012 Picks

February 2nd, 2013

Picking a Top 20 was hard. I came up with a list of over 40, whittled it down to 20, and then couldn’t decide on the order. So here they are alphabetically. Most of these came out in 2012, but I threw in a few here that I just discovered this year that are too good to leave out.

  1. Bill Mallonee – Amber Waves. Bill is still the best. Poetic words, great music.
  2. The Bloody Strummers – Return of the Halcyon Days. Coolest indie combination I have heard: The Doors + SF59. Genius.
  3. Branden Mann And The Reprimand – The Chemicals Won’t Balance. This is 2011 that I just discovered. Groovy folk that is fun to cruise to.
  4. The Choir – The Loudest Sound Ever Heard. The Choir. What else needs to be said? They keep getting better with time.
  5. Destroy Nate Allen – With Our Powers Combined. Crazy fun folk punk that Josh Lory turned me on to.
  6. Insomniac Folklore – A Place Where Runaways are not Alone. I think Steve got me hooked on this dark gothic folk.
  7. Jagged Doctrine – To Whom It May Concern. Industrial metal still rules, and Jagged Doctrine is still bringing it.
  8. Jeff Elbel + Ping – Gallery. Elbel has been all over the place, but his own band is a great listen.
  9. Kissing Cousins – Unfortunate End. Just an EP, but still some great, dark alternative. The cousins never disappoint.
  10. S. Underground – PTSD (Legacy Edition). Okay, the original was out years ago, but this re-master makes it perfect. Probably my top album of the year.
  11. Megadeth – TH1RT3EN. Another 2011 release that I got this year. Mustaine is killing it on his last few albums. This is awesome stuff. Metal rules!
  12. Saint – The Revelation. Not terribly original, but top of the line power metal.
  13. SLIDE – Auto Tune Massacre. I love the sound they hit on here. Collector’s Edition now that they changed their name to Dime Store Zombies.
  14. Soul-Junk – 1961. Brilliant return to indie rock.
  15. Starflyer 59 – IAMACEO. Wasn’t sure how this would be after the last album, but it is an excellent independent debut.
  16. Steve Scott – Emotional Tourist: A Steve Scott Retrospective. Career spanning album that should have been a box set.
  17. Ultra Monark – Exorcising Spirits. Elder/4LC front man returns with the next level of twisted alterna-goth awesomeness.
  18. Unteachers – Fear of Silence. This is technically only one song on a split, but it is one awesome song and the 7-inch has one of the coolest covers ever.
  19. W.A.S.P. – Babylon. Okay, this one is actually 2009, but I finally got a copy and it is really good. Blackie makes more sense that he has embraced God.
  20. Wovenhand – The Laughing Stalk. Awesomeness. Epic awesomeness.

Excerpt from “They Shall Know We Are Christians By Our Political Pressure Moves.”

July 23rd, 2012

A gay man was walking from his house to the neighborhood grocery store, when he was attacked by a group of thugs. They took his clothes and possessions, beat him and went away… leaving him half dead. A preacher happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw that the man was gay, passed by on the other side. A good Christian Mom saw him also and decided to create a movement to boycott the street that let a gay man walk down it. But a homeless man came to where the man was and felt sorry for him. He bandaged his wounds, even putting on some rubbing alcohol he had been saving. Then he put the gay man in his own shopping cart and rolled him to a hotel and took care of him. The next day he took out all the money he had and gave it to the hotel owner. “Look after him,” he said, “and when I return from begging for more money, I will reimburse you for any extra you may have to spend.”

Which of these three do you think was a good Christian to the gay man who fell into the hands of thugs?

The world is full of thugs that want to beat up on all kinds of people – maybe not always physically, but definitely emotionally and socially. Do we want to join the thugs just to get to the chance to “be right”, or do we want to be known for our mercy and compassion?

At one point in history, an expert of religious law was told a story like this one and asked who was the good person in the story.

The expert in religious law replied “The one who had mercy.”

Jesus told him, “Go and do likewise.”

Are we bandaging wounds, or causing more?

(this is an excerpt of a blog post called “They Shall Know We Are Christians By Our Political Pressure Moves.” You can read the rest of this post and all of my other random musings at my Ecclesia Extraneus blog: http://ecclesiaextraneus.wordpress.com)

The Faith of Whitney Houston

February 25th, 2012

Even though I was not a huge fan of her style of music, I always recognized that Whitney Houston was very talented in the genre that she performed in. The death of any person is sad, but I think the circumstances surrounding her life and death make her death even more tragic.

What I am having a hard time understanding is the line of Christians that are coming out to question Houston’s faith. The argument is that her inability to live a “clean” life proves that she never really believed, or maybe even that God doesn’t exist.

So what does it take to prove that you really believe? I think John J. Thompson said it best in an editorial of True Tunes magazine years and years ago: “I cannot prove that anyone is a believer.” Outward signs can be faked. Inward changes can sometimes take years and even decades before they change our outward actions.

I first became a Christian my senior year in high school. It was at least two years after that before I started seeing changes in the way I acted. There was a lot changing on the inside, but the outward shell was still locked. I am sure many people questioned whether I was really a believer at that point. In fact, I know they did, and their judgment proved to be wrong.

And I never had a drug or alcohol problem. Throw that in the mix? Who knows how many decades it would have been before I started looking like a Christian?

Many people that claim to be believers spoke at Houston’s funeral, and they all testified that she “loved the Lord.” Like all of us, she made mistakes and fell into sin. So where is the line that says “on this side, your sin is small enough for us to still count you as a believer; on that side, your sin is just too big and it means that you don’t really believe”?

That is the crux of the issue – our sin does not change our belief. It is our belief that changes our sin… but there is nothing that says it has to be instantaneous, or long and drawn out for that matter. It is often that we all have both going on in our lives. There are things that we change quickly and things we struggle with for years and even decades.

So, I will choose to err on the side of grace and believe that no matter how flawed Houston was, she was a believer. If you want to err on the side of law and condemnation, that is your choice.

The Half-Way Road of Science

September 14th, 2011

One of the first things that come to mind when I think of Science is a scene in Star Trek 4 after the crew of the Enterprise has traveled back in time to 1984. The doctor from the future is walking around a hospital and runs into a lady that is there for a kidney dialysis – a cutting edge modern procedure at the time. Dr. McCoy exclaims “My God, what is this, the Dark Ages?” He then hands her a pill that grows a new kidney – something modern science in 1984 said was impossible.

Science is always evolving… meaning that in 100 years we will look back at our knowledge now and laugh at how misguided we were.

So you always have to take Science with a large dose of humility. One of my degrees is in Geology (from a college that teaches evolution if you are curious), so I say that with a large amount of fear on my part. It’s not exactly en vogue to admit to the limitations of Science.

Those that use Science to explain or deny religion will eventually run into many problems. Not that this means we shouldn’t try… it just means we need to acknowledge the limitations and not let those limitations become proof of anything. That would just be bad science. Lack of evidence usually only proves that you lack evidence, not that anything is a fact.

The Bible is clear that it is only through faith that we will find God. This basically means that there is something that will prevent us from finding Him any other way. If we could prove scientifically that God exists, faith would be eliminated. So would a huge chunk of free will – because who could argue with scientific proof? I’m not sure what that road block is – some have speculated that maybe God created barriers in the scientific world to block absolute proof. Seems kind of mean to me. After all, the Creator of the universe would never have anything to fear from us exploring His creation. Personally, I believe God is just so much more complex than human beings that we could just never create anything big enough to prove Him scientifically.

Of course, Christianity is not the only religion like this. Many world religions have similar beliefs that would make God or Truth impossible to find solely through scientific methods.

So how do we find God? Through the cliché “religious experience”? Or something very subjective and open to interpretation like emotions? Scientists sometimes can’t accept this because you can’t quantify these means scientifically. And thus lies the rub of the “Science-only” route. If you can’t lay it on a lab table and dissect it, it can’t be real. But the Bible tells us that you can’t put it on table and dissect it. You have to have a religious experience, a personal revelation of God, in order to know if He is real or not. You have to have faith first, which is kind of backwards if you think about it.

Many scientists will tell you that religious experiences aren’t real because people from all religions experience them and therefore they are just human experiences. That is a weird idea to take, especially since I have never heard of a dog claiming to have had a religious experience. Therefore, by default all religious experiences ARE human experiences because we only know of humans that have had them.

Many people like to discount religious experiences because people from all religions have them. If non-Christians can have a religious experience, then that means Christianity is false and probably also all religions. God would only speak to members of His real religion, so the fact that all religions have some kind of hard-to-explain “religious experience” component proves they are all false. But the Bible describes a few stories where non-Christians and non-Israelites had genuine religious experiences, like in the story of Balaam & the Angel. So the Bible clearly explains that God speaks to anyone regardless of whether they picked the one “right” religion to follow.

Of course, the fact that we can’t prove or disprove God with Science is scary to some, and reason to hate Science for others. I would suggest to take neither path, but to explore all avenues to finding truth. Science, truth, emotion, and religious experience are all part of the picture and none are to be feared. But none should be left out, either… or your picture will be incomplete.

Beggars, Bread, and Sketches

May 23rd, 2011

I had something in mind that I was going to write for this issue’s column, but then the little one gave us an early wake-up call this morning and my mind went blank. And then I read Steve’s great column and decided to do something different.

Below is a sketch that illustrates what Steve is talking about. It was meant to be turned in to an actual full blown piece of art work, but time has hindered that so far. But sometimes the rough sketches are the best. The imperfections seem real to us, just like the perfection of CG graphics seem so unreal at times.


Free Sessions That Teach GarageBand

May 6th, 2011

If you live near a Guitar World and have wanted to learn how to really use GarageBand to record music, then this is your lucky week! Apple and Guitar World are teaming up to offer free workshops on using GarageBand. According to AppleInsider.com:

The workshops will take place in a four week rotation on Saturdays from 10am-11am at all of Guitar Center’s 216 stores. The first class, Signal Flow and MIcrophone Techniques, takes place on May 7. Additional lessons include Virtual Instruments and Loops, Effects and Mixing and Publishing.

I have to admit that I have never used GarageBand, so I don’t know how good it is for recording. Just passing along the information as I know some love Macs and Garageband.  I actually like both Macs and PCs, but the pricetag on Macs usually makes me lean towards a PC. I did save up for an iMac 6 years ago which is still running and I always loved it.  You can get GarageBand for as low as $14.99, so that is a really low-cost recording option.  Well, if you don’t take in to account all of the equipment needed to hook up to it 🙂

There is also an iPad GarageBand application – so I wonder if iPads could become a new form of cheap, portable recording studios? If so, recording demos could become a snap for bands – just connect everything in at practice and use the best take of each song you want to include on your demo.

Create Music Online with Roc from Aviary

April 15th, 2011

If you haven’t heard of Aviary – you need to check out this crazy collection of online creative tools.  There are all kinds of image editing/creation tools – but I want to focus on the music tools.  Roc is an interesting tool that can be used to make music without any instruments.  Basically, you get a pallet that lets you click what instruments you want to play what note when and Roc puts the rest together for you.

While bands probably won’t use this to replace instruments, it could end up being a great tool for creating quick demos and sketches of song ideas or song parts.  It is cheap (free)  and quick to put stuff together and share. Here is something I threw together:

The sharing part is also interesting – bands could use it to give fans previews of stuff they are working on, or even to let fans vote on different things they like. It is pretty easy to embed your creations on websites, as you can see above.

Of course, if you do want to mix songs or record your voice or instruments, there is also Myna – the free audio editor.

The Future of Album Art?

April 12th, 2011

One of the main problems with the mp3 revolution in music is the death of album art.  I’m not just talking the making of a cool cover – that is still happening about as much as it used to. I am talking about the layout of the whole package – how you design the credits, how many panels there are, how they fold up, how they connect, etc.  Cassettes began a trend towards killing album art, CDs revived the art a bit (on a smaller level), but mp3s really just started to nail the coffin shut.

I don’t necessarily hate mp3s – they are really convenient and easy to store, they don’t skip or scratch, and – if you get them at a good enough quality – they sound great. But they are just not much to look at while you are listening.  Sure, some bands include digital booklets – but those are few and far between.

But has anyone else looked at those digital booklets and thought “with all that technology has to offer, this is all that we get?”

Maybe the iPad will bring in something new here.  The New York Times recently took a look at how labels and musicians are starting to enhance their albums for the iPad.  There are some interesting ideas in this article that could maybe take the album art to the next level by adding apps, video, and social networking. Some of it may sound real gimmicky, but this is a new area that may take a few swings before it hits a home run.

Personally, I love to actually hold albums – especially vinyl ones – in my hands.  But if I HAVE to give that up, I at least better get something like this to take its place.

So bands, this might be something to keep an eye on – your next album may actually be an app.

Form Bands With People From Around The World

March 31st, 2011

I first read about a site called GigIn through HM magazine.  It is an interesting concept.  From what I read, you can join with up to six other people and jam together online:

GigIn is the ultimate online music hub – a virtual space, social network and creative laboratory, that gives everyone a means to connect, compose and make music together, in real time, at any distance, and totally free of charge. Whether you are an amateur or a professional, GigIn taps into every individual’s inner musician allowing you to explore, create and share your own music, broadcast your live shows, attend online festivals, and participate in exclusive contests.

So, the deal is that you can form a band (or re-unite a band) with members from around the world and practice as much as you need.  Then you can even put on live shows together no matter where you live.  Could be an interesting tool for many of the bands that we cover on Down The Line.  They could get together for practice no matter where the members now live. They could work out new material even.  Then they can put on regular concerts for their fans online.

I still need to check it out to see what it is like.  It certainly won’t take the place of a true live concert, but it could also be an interesting idea to help those that can’t get out and tour.